#G.9:3 — Forces

Preface node heading:g-9-3-forces:58702

#Content

• Pluralism vs comparability. Multiple Traditions must be comparable without semantic collapse.
• Partial orders. Many targets are only partially ordered; parity reporting must preserve lawful outcome shape (often portfolios/archives rather than a single scalar).
• Edition sensitivity. Parity must be robust to silent drift in measurement/comparator definitions. When DHC/QD/OEE modes are used, the required definition pins are introduced only via the corresponding Extensions blocks (nil‑elision when unused).
• Telemetry vs objectives. IlluminationSummary and coverage/regret are telemetry: report‑only by default; dominance changes require explicit CAL policy ids (recorded in audit pins).
• GateCrossing visibility. Any crossings/gates used by parity must be visible and auditable via CrossingBundle + GateCrossing checks; failures block parity publication/consumption.
• Cross‑Context reuse. Any reuse across contexts/planes must be explicit, auditable, and penalty‑routed.
• Refreshability. Parity must emit RSCR‑relevant causes as canonical ids, with enough pins to re‑run.