A.6.P:4.3 — Slot‑explicit qualified relation records (recover hidden arity)
Preface node
heading:a-6-p-4-3-slot-explicit-qualified-relation-records-recover-hidden-arity:10748
Content
A conforming text SHALL ensure that each in‑scope relation instance is representable as a Qualified Relation Record (a first‑class record/episteme in the relevant Context) that fills the relation’s slots.
Conceptual notation‑neutral shape:
Notation note (A.6.5 alignment). In this family refMode is a slot‑content mode: either ByValue (inline value of the declared ValueKind) or a concrete RefKind token (slot holds a reference/pin of that RefKind).
Slot naming guard. *Slot suffix names positions (SlotKinds), not occupants; prose SHOULD use occupant names (scope, witnesses, base, dependent, …) for fillers. This is the same guard used in A.6.6 and A.6.5.
Well‑formedness principle. The record is “typed by contract”: SlotSpecs are fixed by the selected RelationKind token, and missing slots are permitted only if the contract says they are optional. This mirrors A.6.6’s scoped/witnessed declaration move (SWBD): “shape + contract makes a concrete typed signature”.
Well‑formedness constraints (non‑deontic).
- WF‑A6P‑QR‑1 (Required slots are present). For any QualifiedRelationRecord
rwithr.relationKind = k,rprovides values for every SlotSpec thatkmarks as required. - WF‑A6P‑QR‑2 (No silent kind swap).
relationKindis part of a record’s identity/edition boundary. If the kind changes, the result is represented as a distinct record/edition linked by an explicitchangeRelationKind(or an explicit withdrawal + re‑declaration), not as an in-place mutation that preserves identity.
Normative prose forms (Tech). In Tech/normative prose, authors SHALL express an in‑scope relation instance in one of the following equivalent forms:
- Functional form:
relationKind(p₁=…, …, pₙ=…, qualifiers…) - Arrow form (binary projection only):
p_left --relationKind{qualifiers}--> p_right
Passive umbrella voice (“X is synced/linked/anchored …”) is permitted only as Plain gloss when immediately rewritten into one of the above forms.
Cross‑Context/plane note (recipe-level).
If any participant/qualifier implies cross‑Context or cross‑plane reuse, the routed claim bundle MUST cite the relevant Bridge ids + CL policy (and loss notes, when applicable) in the appropriate routed claims (typically A-* and/or E-*). Label identity is not an admissible substitute.