A.6.C:3 — Forces

Preface node heading:a-6-c-3-forces:7669

Content

ForceTension
Conversational conveniencePeople will keep saying “contract”; banning the term is unrealistic.
Ontological correctness“Contract” is a metaphor unless we explicitly locate who promises/commits and what can be evidenced.
Boundary diversitySoftware APIs, hardware connectors, protocols, and SLAs share the “contract” word but differ in what is adjudicated and how.
Multi-view publicationFaces are necessary for audience fit, but rephrasing easily creates new commitments.
Adjudicability“Guarantee” claims must either be (i) semantic truths, (ii) deontic commitments, or (iii) evidenced properties—otherwise they are empty rhetoric.
MinimalityThe unpacking should be lightweight enough to apply during routine authoring and review.