#A.2.9:2 — Problem

Preface node heading:a-2-9-2-problem:5091

#Content

How can FPF represent communicative enactments so that:

1. Agency is explicit: a concrete accountable subject performs the act (role/role‑enactor), not a document/spec/interface.
2. The act is locatable in time: the act has an explicit Window (and thus freshness can be evaluated).
3. The act is locatable in meaning: the act is recognized inside a declared bounded context (the U.Work judgement context), not via U.ClaimScope (which expresses applicability of claims/commitments, not the judgement context for Work occurrences).
4. The act is auditable: it has at least one declared utterance description and/or evidence carrier when used for gating or governance.
5. Institutional effects are linkable: the act can institute (or update/revoke) commitments, role assignments, statuses, etc., by reference.
6. Ambiguity is handled pragmatically: the model supports multi‑function / multi‑party communication without requiring full linguistic pragmatics.