FPF Reference

F.1:12.1 Enactment (U.RoleAssignment + U.RoleEnactment) with sensing & execution (service acceptance)

Preface node heading:f-1-12-1-enactment-u-roleassignment-u-roleenactment-with-sensing-execution-service-acceptance:47804

Content

Unification line. Enactment + KD‑CAL (sensing) + Sys‑CAL (execution).

Contexts (six Cards).

  1. BPMN 2.0 (2011) — workflow family; design; graph of flow nodes, participants.
  2. PROV‑O (2013) — provenance family; run; Activity uses/generates Entities; Agents.
  3. ITIL 4 (2020) — services family; design; service, SLO/SLA vocabulary.
  4. ODRL 2.2 — deontics family; design; permission / prohibition / duty.
  5. SOSA/SSN (2017) — sensing family; run; Observation as act with Result.
  6. IEC 61131‑3 — control languages; run; tasks execute control programs.

Thinking pay‑off (examples).

  • You stop saying “process uptime” and think Execution (IEC) measured by Observation (SOSA) compared against SLO (ITIL)—three Contexts, three senses.
  • You mark a trip‑wire: RBAC role (not in this cut) is not a behavioural role (BPMN participant).
  • You resist equating PROV Activity with BPMN workflow; later F.9 may relate them with explicit loss.