#A.6.C:10 — Rationale

Preface node heading:a-6-c-10-rationale:7917

#Content

FPF already distinguishes signatures, mechanisms, and work/evidence layers. Contract-language is a high-frequency linguistic entry point that collapses these layers unless a disciplined unpacking is applied.

F.18 provides the naming intuition (service/promise vs utterance vs commitment) via an NQD example; A.6.C makes that split operational for boundaries and extends it with the missing fourth part: work+evidence as the adjudication substrate. This keeps “contract” language routable under A.6.B and compatible with MVPK multi‑view discipline without relocating ontology into the naming chapter.