A.2.9:4.2 — Minimal structure (normative)
Preface node
heading:a-2-9-4-2-minimal-structure-normative:5131
Content
A conforming U.SpeechAct SHALL be representable by the following minimal record (field names are illustrative; the constraints are normative):
Normative constraints:
- (SA‑C0) Work conformance applies. Because
U.SpeechAct <: U.Work, a speech‑act record MUST satisfyU.Workconformance (A.15.1), including the required anchors (isExecutionOf,performedBy,executedWithin,window, and state‑plane / judgement‑context anchoring). A speech act MUST have at least oneaffectedreferent (the thing it is about/updates), even if it is purely governance‑state. - (SA‑C1) PerformedBy must be an accountable actor.
performedByMUST resolve to aRoleAssignmentRefwhose holder is an accountable system/party in the named scope. It MUST NOT be a spec/interface/document as an episteme. - (SA‑C2) ActTypes are required and context-local.
actTypesMUST contain at least oneSpeechActTypeRefrecognized in the Work’s judgement context (local meaning). Free‑text verbs are nonconformant unless registered as a context token. - (SA‑C3) Time honesty.
windowMUST be explicit (or inherited from the parentU.Workrecord) so freshness rules can be evaluated. - (SA‑C4) If used for gating/audit, it must be observable. If a speech act is used as a checklist criterion, guard condition, or provenance hook for a
U.Commitment, the model SHALL include at least one observable handle:utteranceRefsand/orcarrierRefs. When the act is used as evidence, at least one carrier reference SHOULD be SCR/RSCR‑resolvable per A.10. - (SA‑C5) Institutional effects are references, not paraphrases. When the act is intended to institute/update commitments, role assignments, or statuses,
institutes.*SHOULD reference the corresponding object IDs/claim IDs rather than restating content. - (SA‑C6) Cross-context use is Bridge-only. If a
SpeechActRefis used for checking/gating/provenance in a different bounded context than the act’s judgement context, the referencing object MUST satisfy the spec’s cross-context discipline by citing an explicit Bridge/policy that licenses the interpretation (and surfacing congruence vs loss where applicable), rather than assuming equivalence by label.